Choosing the best sentiment analysis tool for PR success

Andrew Wyatt

September 15, 2025

PR
Tools

PR teams win by mastering two levers: sentiment analysis (decoding tone at scale) and share of voice (SOV) (knowing where you dominate the conversation). Together they turn raw coverage into strategy—catching risks early and amplifying what works.

Sentiment analysis in PR

Sentiment analysis is the AI-powered process of classifying opinions expressed in text as positive, negative, or neutral. It fits across the PR lifecycle: always-on media monitoring, early crisis detection, and post-campaign reporting. For example, after a product launch, teams isolate coverage that references onboarding speed. Tightening the “getting started” section in the press kit leads to a measurable lift in positive story framing the following week [9].

Why it matters

Industry reporting indicates most PR teams now prioritize early signal detection from sentiment trends to reduce time-to-response in issues management [9].
Delve in practice Many platforms stop at article-level polarity. Delve models sentiment at three layers—brand/company, tracked entities (products, executives, events), and message pull-through (your exact talking points)—to distinguish what is positive/negative and why.

Share of voice

Share of voice (SOV) is the percentage of total media coverage that mentions your brand compared with competitors. Here's the formula: Brand mentions ÷ Total mentions in category = SOV% [2]. Why overlay SOV with sentiment? Volume by itself can be a vanity metric; SOV paired with tonality reveals whether spikes are favorable or damaging [2,9]. Counting coverage without tone obscures risk and opportunity—overlay sentiment to understand quality of attention, not just quantity (synthesized from PR.co) [9]. As an example, if SOV jumps from 25% to 33% during a pricing news cycle but net sentiment turns negative, the spike likely reflects controversy, not momentum—redirect narrative and brief spokespeople accordingly.

Beyond SOV: Share of Mentions

Share of Mentions (SoM) compares the count of in-text brand references across all articles in a category, not just whether you were mentioned at least once. This captures how loudly your brand is named within coverage.

How it differs from SOV

  • SOV (binary): Did the article mention the brand? Each article counts once
  • SoM (weighted): How many times was the brand referenced across articles? Mentions are summed and percentage-shared across competitors
  • Mini-example: Category = 200 articles; you appear in 80 of them (SOV = 40%). Across those 200 articles, in-text references total: You 360, Competitor A 270, Competitor B 180 ➔ SoM = 360 / (360+270+180) = 44%

Delve calculates Share of Mentions by counting approved brand variants within each story and can break SoM down by entity (e.g., product vs. company) and by message (e.g., “instant setup”) to show which narratives drive prominence.

How sentiment engines work

Natural language processing techniques behind sentiment scores

Key components include tokenization, part-of-speech tagging, and machine-learning classifiers; deep-learning models now support broad multilingual coverage (200+ languages reported by leading vendors) [7]. Both supervised and unsupervised approaches are used; for niche terminology, prefer tools that support custom model training on your annotated samples [3].

Entity-level and aspect-based sentiment for multi-stakeholder coverage

  • Entity-level sentiment: Detects tone toward each named entity (brand, CEO, competitor) in the same story
  • Aspect-based sentiment: Detects tone toward attributes (price, service, security) about an entity

Why it matters One article can praise the product, critique pricing, and remain neutral on the CEO; entity/aspect views prevent misleading “overall” labels.
Case pattern
In a multi-stakeholder incident, isolating negative sentiment tied to “security policy” around a specific executive clarifies the response track (policy comms vs. product patch).

Delve tracks products, executives, and events as entities and attaches message-level hits (your explicit claims) to reveal which proof points correlate with positive or negative tone.

Handling sarcasm, emojis, and multilingual nuance

Sarcasm detection remains imperfect; leading platforms combine contextual embeddings with emoji/marker libraries, but expert review is advisable for crisis coverage [9]. We recommend using a hybrid workflow: automated scoring for scale paired with human verification on high-stakes clips and major launches.

Evaluation criteria

Coverage of news, broadcast, social, and paywalled sources

Ensure access to: national print, local/regional outlets, trade journals, TV/radio transcripts, online news, and major social platforms. Paywalled sources matter for complete earned-media value and executive-grade reporting [7].

Accuracy, custom AI training, and tonality breakdown depth

Ask vendors for precision/recall benchmarks, vertical model options, and tonality breakdowns beyond polarity (e.g., trust, excitement, concern). Run a pilot on your historical data and edge cases before committing.

Integrations, dashboards, and total cost of ownership

Look for alerts (Slack/Teams), CRM/BI/data-warehouse connectors, and exportable dashboards. Scrutinize hidden costs (API limits, historical backfill, analyst seats). Consider negotiating annual vs. monthly terms for budget efficiency.

Delve offers entity/message-aware sentiment outputs designed to feed BI dashboards and leadership readouts with SOV + SoM context.

Leading sentiment analysis tools for PR teams

Below is an at-a-glance look at seven platforms, grouped by signature strengths. (Vendor claims summarized from public materials; confirm the latest before purchase.)



Language coverage Signature strength  Pro/enterprise
Talkwalker

~127 languages [1]

Predictive anomaly/crisis alerts

Popular in CPG, telecom; topic clusters

Meltwater

Up to 242 languages; ~218 sentiment models [7]

Global multilingual monitoring

Broadcast clipping; influencer add-ons

Cision Communication Cloud

Broad, incl. paywalled; ~96 languages [7]

Premium news sentiment + EMV

Deep publisher access; executive reporting

Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence Global social

Social listening depth (Iris AI, React Score)

Influencer segmentation, visualizations [1]

Lexalytics

Enterprise, developer-friendly

Custom/on-prem; aspect-based sentiment

SDKs/APIs; favored for tailor-made models [5]

Brand24 Multi-platform Budget monitoring

Lower price; fewer languages; no paywalled content

Awario Multi-platform Budget monitoring

Similar trade-offs as Brand24

Delve Up to 242 languages

Entity & message-aware sentiment with Share of Mentions (SoM)

Earned-media focus; SOV + SoM side-by-side

Delve sentiment capabilities

  • Three-layer sentiment: brand/company, entities (products, executives, events), and message pull-through.
  • Share of Mentions (SoM): counts in-text references to weight prominence beyond binary SOV; available by entity and message.
  • Actionable readouts: isolate which product features or claims correlate with positive or negative coverage, by outlet/journalist/region.
  • Neutral output: designed for BI integration and leadership reporting without vendor-specific scoring composites.

References

[1] BuildBetter. 10 Best AI-Powered Brand Sentiment Analysis Tools to Transform CX in 2025
[2] Sprout Social. Share of Voice: What It Is & How to Measure It
[3] SurveySensum. Sentiment Analysis Tool
[4] Cision. Insights: Share of Voice for PR
[5] Kapiche. Best Sentiment Analysis Tools
[6] Launchmetrics. Measure Earned Media Value
[7] Sprout Social. Sentiment Analysis Tools
[8] Prowly. PR Metrics: Share of Voice
[9] PR.co. The Future of Sentiment Analysis
[10] Pacvue. Ultimate Guide to Share of Voice in Retail Media

More from the blog
See all